Massive Dinosaur Soft Tissue Discovery In China – Includes Skin And Feathers!
Is it because the results routinely show man and dinosaurs lived at the same time, thus totally destroying the religion of evolutionism, or is there another reason? Why are the bones assumed to be millions of years old? And if they are, why do they have C14 in them according to those that have tested them? Anything even over , years old should have no detectable C14 in them. Scientists routinely use C14 dating on the bones of mammoths, giant sloths, saber tooth tigers, and other similar ancient animals. Why when they show C14 in them, that indicates they are tens of thousands of years old according to the test; however, if the exact same tests are done on the bones of Why when they show C14 in them, that indicates they are tens of thousands of years old according to the test; however, if the exact same tests are done on the bones of dinosaurs which incidentally also contain soft tissue like the mammoths , and those results also show similar amounts of C14, their derived ages can’t be right, but the mammoths can? That makes sense to you?
Carbon 14 Dating of Dinosaur Bones
BETA has been the world leader in Carbon analyses since and has unmatched expertise analyzing complex samples. Radiocarbon, or carbon , is present in all living and recently expired matter Anything that is more than 50, years old no longer has carbon One industrial application of radiocarbon dating is ASTM D This discussion is a simplified introduction to radiocarbon dating. There are exceptions to the theories and relationships introduced below that are beyond the scope of this discussion.
Carbon is the basis of life and is present in all living things.
Reflections on Oral and Poster Presentations of Percent of Modern C (pmC) Content Studies of Dinosaur Bones given at the AOGS-AGU Singapore Conference – Offers support for the Abrupt Appearance Theory of Life origins and demonstrates predictive and reproducibility quality of .
Dinosaur bones Carbon dated to less than 40, years – Censored international conference report Researchers have found a reason for the puzzling survival of soft tissue and collagen in dinosaur bones — the bones are younger than anyone ever guessed. Carbon C dating of multiple samples of bone from 8 dinosaurs from Texas, Alaska, Colorado, and Montana revealed that they are only 22, to 39, years old.
Since dinosaurs are thought to be over 65 million years old, the news is stunning. And more than some can tolerate. After the AOGS-AGU conference in Singapore, the abstract was removed from the conference website by two chairmen because they could not accept the findings. Unwilling to challenge the data openly, they erased the report from public view without a word to the authors or even to the AOGS officers, until after an investigation.
It won’t be restored. Carbon is considered to be unassailable in its reliability among dating methods. The possibility that the amount of C in the air has fluctuated adds a small uncertainty. But the greater possibility for error is that the amount of C in bone samples has been altered by contaminants such as decayed organic matter from soils. Thomas Seiler, a physicist from Germany, gave the presentation in Singapore.
He says that his team and the laboratories they employed took special care to avoid contamination. That included protecting the samples, avoiding cracked areas in the bones, and meticulous pre-cleaning of the samples with chemicals to remove possible contaminants.
So how many millions of years old are those fossils? Scientific dating that shows that some dinosaurs are young? What kinds of dinosaurs? Details of the Carbon Dating Between and , the Paleochronology group sent eleven dinosaur bone samples to be carbon-dated by a respected laboratory:
Jim johnson investigates viking bones. Until recently, years old. And environmental sciences such as radiocarbon dating the age of biological artifacts. Willard libby, years ago? How old. Love-Hungry teenagers and dinosaur bones. This article, years ago. C .
Senior research scientist Alexander Cherkinsky specializes in the preparation of samples for Carbon testing. He directed the pretreatment and processing of the dinosaur bone samples with the Accelerator Mass Spectrometer, though he did not know the bones were from dinosaurs, and he signed the reports. Carbon dating at this facility is certainly the very best. But in , someone told the director of the facility, Jeff Speakman, that the Paleochronology group was showing the Carbon reports on a website and YouTube and drawing the obvious conclusions.
So when he received another bone sample from the Paleochronology group, he returned it to sender and sent an email saying: The scientists at CAIS and I are dismayed by the claims that you and your team have made with respect to the age of the Earth and the validity of biological evolution. Consequently, we are no longer able to provide radiocarbon services in support of your anti-scientific agenda.
C-14 Dating of Dinosaur Bones
An article in the January National Geographic boldly proclaimed: The evidence, however, reveals an entirely different story. Hubbard found elegant drawings of an elephant, an ibex, a dinosaur, and other animals. He stated concerning the dinosaur drawing: The fact that some prehistoric man made a pictograph of a dinosaur on the walls of this canyon upsets completely all of our theories regarding the antiquity of man
Further Chart of C test of additional non fossilized dinosaur bones. Conclusion to RC (C) Dating Dinosaur Bones It is a really simple question, Dr. Schweitzer.
Until recent years, scientists who believe in creation haven’t had the necessary resources to explore radiometric dating in detail. A 10 gram sample of U Now that has changed, and some important discoveries are being made. When granite rock hardens, it freezes radioactive elements in place. The most common radioactive element in granite is Uranium This element is locked in tiny zircons within the granite. As part of the decay process, helium is produced.
While it stays within the zircon for a period of time, being a very small atom, helium escapes the zircon within a few thousand years. When creation scientists studied granite samples, they made interesting discoveries. The samples were from a mile below the earth, which, according to inflated evolutionary years, were 1. The helium still locked in the samples was studied as well as the rate at which the helium diffused from the rock.
There Were Giants in Those Days
Here, RSR presents the scientific journals reporting, the kinds of biological material found so far, and the dinosaurs yielding up these exciting discoveries: Dinosaur and Dinosaur-Layer Creatures: As you view the exciting scientific discoveries below in this chronological catalog, please feel free to listen to Real Science Radio co-hosts Fred Williams and Bob Enyart observe their annual tradition of presenting dinosaur soft tissue and other amazing discoveries including short-lived left-handed amino acids , DNA , and Carbon 14 , all in bones and other specimens from dinosaur-layer Mesozoic and even deeper strata.
As for these photos though, North Carolina State University discovered this original biological tissue from a supposedly million-year-old Tyrannosaurus Rex thighbone, with transparent and pliable blood vessels containing red blood cells.
Xavier Kabrera and other explorers, and stored in the private museum of Dr. Kabrera, as well as the Ica museum, the Aeronautics museum in Lima, the Naval museum in Callao, and others. The total number of Ica Stones is between 11, and 15, , and, according to Dr. Kabrera, taking into account all of the stones which have been distributed to private collectors, there are more than 50, stones. Kabrera estimates that in subsoil buried or hidden remains more than – thousand similar stones.
The engraved Ica stones are river boulders of andesite from g to kg in weight and from several centimeters to 1 meter and more in diameter length with pictograph inscribed on them by some means of engraving – grooves of mm in depth, or executed in the technology of a low relief. The images are different enough and include: People and extinct dinosaur figures Polydactyl horses meryhippuses , prehistoric elephants mastodon or dinotheres , prehistoric camels alticameluses , and other animals Dinosaurs including triceratops, stegosauruses, brachiosaurs, pterosaurs, iguanodons, tyrannosaurs and pterodactyls, etc.
Semimen-semibirds, like kimnaras and sirens People astride polydactyl horses, prehistoric elephants, alticameluses, dinosaurs Operations on ablation of extremities limbs , transplantation of kidneys, hearts, trepanation of sculls and replanting of brain and so on Geographical and star maps with images of known and unknown continents, the suns, stars, comets and “people” watching them Erotic scenes of obvious homosexual activity, etc.
Both pterosaurs and dinosaurs were supposed to have become extinct many millions of years ago, at least according to popular models in Western cultures. Recent sightings of living pterosaurs fit with the concept that dinosaurs also lived much more recently. How do we know that dinosaurs lived much more recently than many millions of years ago? Nobody seems to have raised any negative comment at the lecture, but later their abstract of the presentation was removed from the official web site.
It was deleted without explanation. Notice the absence of abstract number five, the lecture about carbon dating of dinosaur fossils that were excavated in North America.
Mar 03, · “It became clear years ago that paleontologists were not just neglecting to test dinosaur bones for C content but were refusing to. Normally a good scientist will be curious about the ages of important fossil bones,” Hugh Miller, a research and consulting chemist and Head of the Paleochronology Group, told Ancient Origins in an email.
Welcome to the home of The Question Evolution Project. Presenting information demonstrating that there is no truth in minerals-to-man evolution, and presenting evidence for special creation. Others tried to downplay and ignore them, but they’re here — and they’re spoiling Darwin’s party. It shouldn’t be a surprise to learn that Darwin’s disciples are loathe to have dinosaur fossil tissue tested for carbon After all, that would mean their deep time presuppositions are wrong.
No soft tissues in this bad boy, he’s entirely concrete. Other evolutionists have resisted having specimens carbon tested as well. Well, despite the desire to protect evolutionism from science, C testing was eventually done. The results were not good for the Darwin club. Yippie ky yay, secularists! This article will explain how recent events, including the announcement of dinosaur soft tissue and carbon C in the otherwise ordinary bones of major classes of dinosaurs collected from museum shelves and throughout the geological column, may have placed evolutionists in a zugzwang-like position with respect to their long-held beliefs concerning the origin of life.
Age of the earth
The main point of the debate seems to be the following: Over the past decades, several research groups of self-proclaimed creationist scientists have claimed discoveries of dinosaur bones that they have managed to date, using radiocarbon dating methods , at some age which is a lot below the ‘usual’ i. The age that these groups claim to find is usually on the order of thousands or tens of thousands of years old. The particular example you bring up is one of the most famous such cases.
The claims are really quite spectacular, when taken at face value, and therefore should be examined thoroughly. In this answer, I will try to go through this story in great detail, hopefully exposing the reasons why this work is not taken seriously by scientists.
The short half-life is only part of the problem when dating dinosaur bones — researchers also have to find enough of the parent and daughter atoms to measure. Read on to see what it takes to date a fossil and what volcanic ash has to do with it.
The Oldest Living Thing: The oldest living thing on earth is either an Irish Oak or a Bristlecone pine. If we assume a growth rate of one tree ring per year, then the oldest trees are between 4, and 4, years old. Also, with regard to fossil tree rings, the author has been unable to find any documented instances of fossil trees having more than about rings. This is significant since we are told that God literally made the Earth, and all that is in it, only about years before the Noachian Flood described in the Book of Genesis.
In a Bristlecone Pine tree was discovered that has just over 5, tree rings. Helium in the Atmosphere:
Carbon-14 in Coal Deposits
The succession is made up of the mixed alluvial—lacustrine—lagoonal Hastings Beds Group below and the predominantly lacustrine—lagoonal Weald Clay Group above. Deposition was strongly influenced by tectonism amongst surrounding massifs, and the warm to hot, periodically wet Wealden climate. Geological Conservation Review sites within the Weald district are dominated by inland sites, but also include extensive coastal cliff and foreshore exposures near Hastings, East Sussex.
The Wealden strata have been documented and interpreted since the earliest days of geological enquiry in Great Britain. Collectively, the selected sites demonstrate the key elements of a depositional model for the Wealden of the Weald, developed and published by Professor Percival Allen FRS — in these Proceedings Allen,
Recent C Dating of Fossils including Dinosaur Bone Collagen. dinosaur depictions world-wide 57 it is paramount that scientists test for C in dinosaurs world-wide to see if C in dinosaur bones is a world-wide phenomenon. Truth in science emerges in experimentation and keen observations.
Photos from Last Refuge. The tracks included those of a human heel ball thirteen inches wide! It doesn’t make a big deal about them–no theological points about them except that God’s people could defeat anyone. Scripture states that Goliath was about 9 feet tall. Og, King of Bashan described above was thought to have been taller; his bed needed to be made of iron and was about 15 feet by 6 to 7 feet wide literally, king sized.
He was thought to be 10 to 12 feet tall and proportionate.
1. Rate of Decay
Can science prove the age of the earth? No scientific method can prove the age of the earth and the universe, and that includes the ones we have listed here. Further, it has to be assumed that the clock was never disturbed. There is no independent natural clock against which those assumptions can be tested. For example, the amount of cratering on the moon, based on currently observed cratering rates, would suggest that the moon is quite old.
However, if a bone an evolutionist thinks is a million years old contains any detectable carbon, the bone is probably less than , radiocarbon years. Bones or other organic remains that contain enough carbon and are believed by evolutionists to be older than , years will be shown to be relatively young in blind radiocarbon tests.
I don’t know why it was put back into the rotation when the recent comments link didn’t work, anyway. Makes for difficult blogging. June 10, at 1: If you post on page 1 the new post links work, however, maybe move the discussion there ? June 10, at 2: I’ve been meaning to ask you that. You were one of the first people I talked to when I first came on. Me and mine are doing well; I hope the same is true for you and yours. It may be that some people confuse skepticism and denial.